66 DRIVE-IN, INC., PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT, v. HYCEL PARTNERS III, L.P., HYCEL III, INC., AND SCHNUCK MARKETS, INC., DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS.

No. 66845.Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
May 2, 1995.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY; ALPHONSO H. VOORHEES, JUDGE.

Page 204

Daniel T. Rabbitt, Matthew J. Sauter, Rabbitt, Pitzer
Snodgrass, St. Louis, for appellant.

Bryan Cave, Gerard T. Carmody, Dan M. Lesicko, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., GRIMM, C.J., and KAROHL, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

[1] Plaintiff 66 Drive-In appeals the dismissal of its petition against the guarantors of a development agreement for interest on plaintiff’s condemnation award after the developer abandoned the condemnation of plaintiff’s land.

[2] No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[3] The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16 (b).