C.J.W. v. STATE, 331 S.W.3d 731 (Mo.App.E.D. 2011)

C.J.W., Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. ED94383.Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
February 22, 2011.

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County; William J. Syler, Judge.

Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO for respondent.

Page 732

Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

Movant, C.J. W., appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).