AKINS v. DUNHAMS CLEANING SERVICE, 17 S.W.3d 606 (Mo.App.E.D. 2000)


KEITH AKINS, APPELLANT, vs. DUNHAMS CLEANING SERVICE, RESPONDENT.

No. ED76887.Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Filed: May 16, 2000.

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]

APPEAL FROM THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION.

Matthew J. Padberg, Michael P. Corrigan, THE PADBERG LAW FIRM, 1010 Market Street, Suite 650, St. Louis, MO 63101, attorneys for appellant.

Dennis R. Lassa, FIELD, GENTRY BENJAMIN, P.C., 906 Olive Street, Thirteenth Floor, St. Louis, MO 63101, attorneys for respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, P.J. and Paul J. Simon and James R. Dowd, JJ.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

Keith Akins appeals an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission dismissing his application for review of the dismissal of his claim for workers’ compensation benefits.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. As an extended opinion

Page 607

would have no precedential value, we affirm the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).