ALDRIDGE v. STATE, 119 S.W.3d 565 (Mo.App.E.D. 2003)

JESSE E. ALDRIDGE, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent.

No. ED 82063Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
October 28, 2003

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Honorable Jon A. Cunningham.

Stacy F. Sullivan, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO, 63103, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Breck K. Burgess, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO, 65102, for respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Sr., P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J. and Mary R. Russell, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Jesse Aldridge (“movant”), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County denying his Rule 24.035[1] motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted of one count of robbery in the first degree, section 569.020
RSMo

Page 566

2000[2] , and one count of armed criminal action, section 571.015. Movant was sentenced to concurrent terms of ten years on each count. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.