CLARK v. STATE, 119 S.W.3d 154 (Mo.App.E.D. 2003)

MICHAEL A. CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent.

No. ED 81783Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
October 7, 2003

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, Honorable Steven H. Goldman.

Ruth B. Sanders, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Booker T. Shaw, P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and George W. Draper III, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

Michael A. Clark appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. We

Page 155

affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in the judgment. Rule 84.16(b).