PHILLIP CLAY, MOVANT-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

No. 55505.Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 2, 1989. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 7, 1989. Application to Transfer Denied August 1, 1989.

APPEAL FROM CITY OF ST. LOUIS CIRCUIT COURT, THOMAS F. McGUIRE, JUDGE.

Page 782

Melinda K. Pendergraph, Columbia, Mo., for movant-appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John P. Pollard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent-respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

[1] Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Tagged: