DAVIS v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, 110 S.W.3d 872 (Mo.App.E.D. 2003)

ROLAND DAVIS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Defendant/Respondent.

No. ED 82170Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
July 22, 2003

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis; Margaret Mary Neill, Judge.

Roland Davis, Licking, pro se.

Patricia A. Hageman, Edward J. Hanlon, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

Roland Davis appeals from the judgment dismissing his negligence action. He asserts that the statute of limitations should not apply. No error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value. The parties, have, however, been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).