DROEGE v. NORMAN, 247 S.W.3d 606 (Mo.App.E.D. 2008)

William J. DROEGE, D.C., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Thomas D. NORMAN, Defendant/Appellant.

No. ED 88821.Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
March 18, 2008.

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Thomas C. Clark II, Judge.

Thomas D. Norman, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Kurt Joseph Dolan, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.

Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J. and KURT S. ODENWALD, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

Appellant Thomas D. Norman appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Respondent William J. Droege awarding $4,847.62 in damages and interest on the parties’ contract for chiropractic services. We have reviewed the briefs and the record, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).