REGINALD EVANS, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent.

No. ED 82314Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
November 18, 2003

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Honorable Philip J. Sweeney.

Jo Ann Rotermund, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Booker T. Shaw, P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and George W. Draper III, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

Reginald Evans (“Movant”) appeals the denial without an evidentiary hearing of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Tagged: