FONDREN v. SALMONS, 2 S.W.3d 845 (Mo.App.E.D. 1999)

WILL A. FONDREN, APPELLANT v. MARVIN LEO SALMONS, RESPONDENT.

No. ED 74998Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Order Filed: September 21, 1999

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, John F. Garvey, Judge.

Stanford Richardson, Jr. St. Louis, for appellant.

Gary P. Paul, Brinker Doyen, Clayton, for respondent.

Before: Richard B. Teitelman, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.

[1] ORDER
PER CURIAM. [2] Will A. Fondren (Plaintiff) appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of Marvin L. Salmons (Defendant) in Plaintiff’s negligence action against Defendant for injuries arising from an automobile accident. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The summary judgment motion, along with its supporting affidavit and discovery materials and the response thereto, support the trial court’s determination that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that Defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A written opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. [3] The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).