IN RE MARRIAGE OF MILLS, 908 S.W.2d 188 (Mo.App.E.D. 1995)

IN RE MARRIAGE OF KATHLEEN MILLS AND ROBERT MILLS. KATHLEEN MILLS, PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/CROSS-APPELLANT, v. ROBERT MILLS, RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Nos. 66899, 67107.Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
October 24, 1995.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY; SUSAN E. BLOCK, JUDGE.

Susan M. Hais, Hais Carmody, P.C., St. Louis, for Respondent/Appellant Mrs. Mills.

Michael C. Walther, Walther Roberts, Clayton, Rochelle A. Kaskowitz, St. Louis, for Appellant/Respondent/Appellant Mr. Mills.

Before CRANE, C.J., SIMON, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.

[1] ORDER
PER CURIAM.

[2] Both parties appeal from the trial court’s judgment in a dissolution case. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. 1976).

[3] An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for

Page 189

their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[4] The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).