IN THE INTEREST OF B.L.M., 39 S.W.3d 75 (Mo.App.E.D. 2001)

In the Interest Of: B.L.M.

No. ED 78019Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Filed: March 6, 2001

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HON. SUSAN BLOCK

Cynthia Lynn Harcourt-Hearring, 3rd floor, 501 S. Brentwood, Clayton, MO 63105, David Allyn Shaller, GAL 7751 Carondelet, Suite 505 Clayton, MO 63105, for Respondent.

Brian Paul Seltzer, 230 S. Bemiston, Suite 410, Clayton MO 63105, Margaret T. Donnelly, 130 S. Bemiston, Suite 706, Clayton, MO 63105, for Appellant.

Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Paul J. Simon, J., and Sherri B. Sullivan, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

C.M. (Mother) and M.A.M. (Father) (collectively Appellants) both appeal from the judgment of the family court terminating their parental rights to their child B.L.M (Child). The appeals have been consolidated for purposes of this opinion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the family court is supported by substantial evidence. In the Interest of D.L.M., 31 S.W.3d 64, 68 (Mo.App.E.D. 2000). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).