IN THE INTEREST OF: L.S., A MINOR, AND H.S., APPELLANT, v. JUVENILE OFFICER OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI, RESPONDENT.

No. ED 75405Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Filed: October 19, 1999

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]

Appeal from the Family Court of St. Louis County, Chester B. Hayes, Commissioner

John R. Bird, St. Louis, for appellant.

Cynthia Harcourt-Hearing, St. Louis for respondent.

Before: MARY RHODES RUSSELL, C. J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and CHARLES BLACKMAR, Sr.J.

[1] ORDER
PER CURIAM.

[2] Appellant appeals the decision of the trial court terminating his parental rights. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo.banc 1976).

[3] An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

[4] We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Tagged: