NEIGHBORS v. WILLIAMS, 230 S.W.3d 661 (Mo.App.E.D. 2007)

NEIGHBORS CREDIT UNION, Respondent, v. Loretta WILLIAMS, Appellant.

No. ED 88789.Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
August 21, 2007.

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Gloria C. Reno, Judge.

Neighbors Credit Union, St. Louis, MO, pro se.

Loretta Williams, Normandy, MO, pro se.

Page 662

Before ROY L. RICHTER, J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

Loretta Williams appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of Neighbors Credit Union. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find appellant’s brief severely deficient. The brief wholly fails to comply with Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.04, and as such precludes meaningful review. Dismissal of the appeal is appropriate under these circumstances. Nonetheless, after reviewing the claim ex gratia, as best we can discern from appellant’s brief there is no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).