LINDA J. RINDERER, CLAIMANT/RESPONDENT, v. MAPLEWOOD EYE CARE GROUP, EMPLOYER/APPELLANT.

No. 61457.Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
August 11, 1992. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied September 14, 1992.

APPEAL FROM THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION.

David R. Swimmer, Private Atty., Clayton, for employer/appellant.

Nancy R. Mogab, Mogab Hughes, St. Louis, for claimant/respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

[1] Employer appeals from an award to claimant by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Page 25

Tagged: