RICHARD SALES, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT.
No. WD 53148Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Opinion Filed: June 24, 1997
[1] [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY,MISSOURI, HONORABLE WILLIAM F. MAUER, JUDGE.
Jeannie Arterburn Willibey, Esq., Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant.
John Munson Morris, Esq., Jefferson City, MO, Attorney for Respondent.
Before: Ellis, P.J., Lowenstein and Howard, JJ.
[2] ORDER
PER CURIAM
[3] Movant claims the trial court erred in denying his Rule 24.035 Motion because his plea lacked voluntariness in that he was unaware that in the event his probation was revoked, he would have to serve the full suspended sentence, and that his probation could be revoked for failure to follow a directive initiated by his probation officer. Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
