SIMPSON-EL v. STATE, 69 S.W.3d 147 (Mo.App.E.D. 2002)

EDWARD SIMPSON-EL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent/Respondent.

No. ED 79483.Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
February 26, 2002.

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County; James R. Hartenbach, Judge.

Jennifer S. Walsh, Assistant Public Defenders, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

Edward Simpson-El (Appellant) appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 24.035,[1]
without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court are not clearly erroneous.Moss v. State, 10 S.W.3d 508, 511 (Mo.banc 2000). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).