DARREN SMITH, MOVANT/APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT.
No. 67621.Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
October 24, 1995.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS; JIMMIE EDWARDS, JUDGE.
Douglas R. Hoff, Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, John Munson Morris III, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.
[1] ORDER
PER CURIAM.
[2] Movant appeals the motion court’s judgment denying Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
