STATE v. BERRY, 869 S.W.2d 860 (Mo.App.E.D. 1994)

STATE OF MISSOURI, PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, v. MICHAEL P. BERRY, DEFENDANT/APPELLANT. MICHAEL P. BERRY, MOVANT/APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT.

Nos. 62015, 63642.Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
February 1, 1994.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY; STEVEN H. GOLDMAN, JUDGE.

Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Page 861

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

[1] Defendant appeals his conviction, by a jury, of three counts of first degree robbery, § 569.020, RSMo 1986, two counts of pharmacy robbery first degree, § 569.025, RSMo Supp. 1993, and two counts of armed criminal action, § 571.015 RSMo 1986. He was sentenced by the court as a class X offender to seven concurrent life sentences. He also appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Page 861