STATE v. BRADLEY, 945 S.W.2d 698 (Mo.App.E.D. 1997)

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. MICHAEL BRADLEY, Appellant. MICHAEL BRADLEY, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent.

Consolidated No. 69745.Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
ORDER FILED: May 27, 1997.

[1] [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Sherri B. Sullivan.

Robert Steele, Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

John Munson Morris, III, Attorney General, Lisa A. Fischer, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before Dowd, Jr., P.J., Reinhard, and Gaertner, JJ.

[2] ORDER
PER CURIAM

[3] Appellant, Michael Bradley, appeals the judgment of conviction for burglary in the second degree, RSMo § 569.170 (1994), entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury trial. Appellant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. [4] We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of conviction is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. We further find the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgments pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).