STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff/Respondent, vs. LORENZO CALLIES, Defendant/Appellant. LORENZO CALLIES, Movant/Appellant, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 68008 No. 70462Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
OPINION FILED: March 18, 1997
[1] [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HON. EDWARD M. PEEK.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HON. DANIEL T. TILLMAN.
John M. Schilmoeller, Public Defender, Office of State Public Defender, St. Louis, for movant/appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent/respondent.
Before: Dowd, Jr., P.J., Reinhard, J., and Gaertner, J.
[2] ORDER
PER CURIAM.
[3] Defendant appeals after his conviction by a jury of one count of stealing a motor vehicle, §
570.030, RSMo 1986. Defendant also appeals the partial denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons
Page 767
for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
Page 767
