STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. DAVID A. CONRAD, Appellant. DAVID A. CONRAD, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent.
Consolidated No. 68421Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
OPINION FILED: March 18, 1997
[1] [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LEWIS COUNTY, HON. BRUCE NORMILE.
David L. Simpson, Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
John Munson Morris, III, Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before Dowd, Jr., P.J., Reinhard, and Gaertner, JJ.
[2] ORDER
PER CURIAM
[3] Appellant, David A. Conrad, appeals the judgment of conviction for two counts of sodomy, RSMo §
566.060 (1994), entered by the Circuit Court of Lewis County after a jury trial. Appellant also appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
[4] We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of conviction is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. We further find the judgment denying the Rule 29.15 motion is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
Page 766
