STATE v. SNIDER, 959 S.W.2d 922 (Mo.App.E.D. 1998)

STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT v. JESSE JAMES SNIDER, APPELLANT. JESSE JAMES SNIDER, MOVANT-APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT.

Nos. 67194, 70961Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, WRIT DIVISION THREE
OPINION FILED: January 13, 1998

[1] [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CHARLES COUNTY, HON. DAVID A. DALTON, JUDGE.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CHARLES COUNTY, HON. WILLIAM T. LOHMAR, JR., JUDGE.

Raymond J. Capelovitch, Assistant Public Defender, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Cristi A. Ingalsbe, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., CRANDALL, JR. KAROHL, JJ., concurring.

[2] ORDER
PER CURIAM

[3] Defendant appeals after sentencing on four counts of forgery, Section 570.090.1(4) RSMo 1986 and denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The only issues presented relate to the Rule 29.15 appeal. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment.

Page 923

Judgments affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b)and 84.16(b).