Deanna VINSON, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Ray VINSON, Respondent/Appellant.

Nos. ED 86116, ED 86147.Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
April 18, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County; Thea A. Sherry, Judge.

Michael A. Gross, Joseph F. Yeckel, Law Offices of Michael A. Gross, Allan H. Zerman, James P. Carmody, Zerman Mogerman LLC, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Craig G. Kallen III, Hais, Hais Kallen, P.C., Edward L. Dowd, Jr., James F. Bennett, Kenneth L. Marshall, Bryan Cave L.L.P., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and ROY L. RICHTER, J.

ORDER
PER CURIAM.

Respondent husband appeals from a judgment entering a full order of protection under the Adult Abuse Act. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, and does not erroneously declare or misapply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30
(Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for

Page 652

their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Tagged: