No. 58179.Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
December 18, 1990.
APPEAL FROM MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT, CITY OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY; ROBERT H. DIERKER, JR., JUDGE.
Stephan Joseph Nangle, Barbara S. Nangle, St. Louis, for appellant.
James J. Wilson, Government Counsel, David Richard Bohm, Asst. City Counselor, St. Louis, for respondent.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
[1] Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment granted to defendant on a declaratory judgment action. We affirm. The Findings and Conclusions of the trial court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).March 1860 Supreme Court of Missouri 30 Mo. 26 The State, Respondent, v. Ramelsburg, Appellant…
STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. GREGORY WILLIAMS, APPELLANT. GREGORY WILLIAMS, MOVANT-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI,…
AMANDA DAWN RAMSEY (APPELLANT) v. DICKIE ALLEN MULKEY (APPELLANT). No. WD 52015Missouri Court of Appeals,…
DANIEL R. WALKER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT. No. KCD 29179.Missouri Court of Appeals,…
266 S.W. 470 FRED W. KLECKAMP, JR., by Next Friend, FRED W. KLECKAMP, SR., v.…
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ryan C. CHRISTIAN, Appellant. No. WD71992.Missouri Court of Appeals, Western…