WEINTRAUB v. DRUCKER, 965 S.W.2d 187 (Mo.App.E.D. 1998)

ROSETTA WEINTRAUB, Personal Representative of the Estate of GERALDINE DRUCKER, deceased, Appellant, vs. BARRY DRUCKER and SANDRA DRUCKER, Respondents.

No. 71737.Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
ORDER FILED: January 20, 1998. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 24, 1998. Application for Transfer Denied May 26, 1998.

[1] [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS OPINION IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION OR TRANSFER TO THE SUPREME COURT.]

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HON. MARK D. SEIGEL.

Page 188

Irl B. Baris, Jon M. Baris, Baris Law Firm, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jack B. Spooner, Wittner, Poger, Rosenblum, Kessler, Spewak
Maylack, P.C., St. Louis, for respondent.

Before: Kathianne Knaup Crane, P.J., Mary Rhodes Russell, J., and James R. Dowd, J.

[2] ORDER
PER CURIAM.

[3] This is an appeal from a judgment for defendants in an action for an accounting. There is sufficient evidence to support the judgment. No error of law appears. [4] An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. [5] We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).